Economy

The Value of Design by Jonnel Mamauag

This article was originally published on Medium.com on 23, January 2021.

What is worth to you?

To start, by no definition do I attest and claim that I can accurately know the actual value of things as it relates to its monetary meaning. I am not an economist, and one man’s treasure can be another man’s trash. Or is it the other way around?

Nonetheless, I will be discussing the intangible; Individually, we see the value by its merit of how we perceive, receive and experience the benefit of what we purchase. Either in terms of service, a product, or both.

For this piece, I will discuss the two critical variables that affect the intangible value of good design service in producing Architecture. This view is profoundly influenced by my Architectural training which you can read all about that in a series of previous articles starting here. So if you have a different experience or perspective in mind, I would love to hear about it!

Regardless of the size, construction projects are composed of two cost categories: hard and soft cost. The hard cost is typically the list of items that relates the project's physical result, that is the building. That is to say the material cost (steel, timber, concrete, glass, etc.) and labour.

The soft cost relates to any service(s) that will facilitate the Client get to the project's physical result (i.e. the building). This includes professional consultant fees (which encompasses services from your Architect, Engineer, etc.) and any other fees related to getting the project permitted. This may include, but not limited to, town-planning and building permit application fees. If you are a developer, there may be contribution fees that you need to pay towards adding the additional infrastructure necessary for your development.

Both types of cost vary from one location to another. So it pays to consult with your local professionals, council and trades for your project. My areas of expertise and experience lie on the side of the soft-cost of a building project. That is, the architectural design service, specifically for residential projects.

So what does it cost to design a house?

My answer to this sort of question always depends on two main things:

  1. What is the project brief?

  2. Who are you hiring?

The first item is fundamental and essential. The project brief helps the design professional to define the goal of the project. The clearer the project brief, the more predictable the cost would be for both parties. With this in mind, there are still a few more variables that need to be considered.

The ideal scenario is that a Client will engage a consultant for their full service across all project stages. From initial feasibility, which is seeing what can be built for how much. Up to the project's actual construction in the form of the design professional visiting the site and doing some quality checks if their drawings are actually being constructed to the agreed level of quality and specification.

The clearer the project brief, the more predictable the cost would be for both parties

In some circumstance, some design professionals are only contracted for certain aspects or stages of the project. Some designers and architects are known for their conceptual vision, while some are more known for their technical prowess and know-how. Each skillset, experience and interest have their place. It really depends on the Client’s budget and timeline.

As of late, I’m seeing a shift from a full-service offer to being contracted only for specific stages and task for a project. For myself, it has been more on the technical and consenting stages of the project. This benefits the consumer more than the professional in my view. But at the same time, I think it gives clarity on the professional's involvement in the project and gives them focus.

The second part of who are you hiring, which is akin, in my view, buying the same dish from two different restaurants. One is high-end fine dining we need to wear a dinner jacket type of establishment. The other is the take-away shop around the corner you usually reserve after finishing an all-night rager at the bars. One will change how you view about that specific dish. The other, well, we’ll see in the morning, because right now you need sustenance.

Engaging a design professional is akin to buying the same dish from two different restaurants.

The cost of hiring a design professional with a more comprehensive portfolio, accolades, and notoriety bump up that price. On the other hand, a design professional starting and building their portfolio may charge a significantly lower fee for the same brief.

Sometimes Clients want a basic house with walls and a roof, that does not leak and will not fall. Because doing otherwise would mean legal implications for both parties, not to mention any health and safety implications. Anything beyond that has some “flair” will and should cost something extra.

That flair is about the emotional connection of the proposed design.

That flair is about the emotional connection of the proposed design. Does it speak of the narrative of the lifestyle of the user? The history of the land? A sustainable approach to the building? Is it a complex structure that has bespoke elements that cannot be found off the shelf? These things all add up in the end as part of the brief and the professional's capability to deliver.

Speaking on the design consultants' side, sometimes we bump up our pricing based on the Client. Are they going to be working with us closely or hands-off in terms of getting the work done? How often they want updates, the type of deliverables they wish to have, i.e. drawings, renders or physical models.

So really it is about clarity. Clarity of the brief, the quality of design service and what type of work or result you expect at the end.

Of Economy and Design in Architecture — Part 5: Into the looking glass by Jonnel Mamauag

The future of economic considerations in architectural design

This is a series of articles relating to intersecting relationship between design and economics. This is by no far a full coverage of the intersection of the two subject areas. Individually, they can easily be callosal in scope. Instead, as an architectural designer, this is my attempt to explain how I see the two concepts pulling and pushing in real-time.

Read the previous post in this series here. For the original post of this series, start here.

As the world continues to evolve and change, the way we approach architectural design must also adapt to meet the needs and challenges of the future.

Economic considerations have always played a significant role in the design process. Still, as resources become increasingly scarce and construction cost rises, it is more important than ever to consider the long-term economic impact of our buildings. This includes not only the initial cost of construction and materials but also the ongoing maintenance and energy costs that will be incurred over the lifetime of the building.

Additionally, as environmental sustainability becomes a more pressing concern, architects must consider their designs' environmental and economic impact, including the use of renewable resources and energy-efficient systems.

The future of architectural design will likely involve a greater focus on these economic considerations as we strive to create both functional and financially viable buildings in the long term.

Predictions for how economic factors will continue to shape the field of architecture

As the demand for more sustainable, energy-efficient buildings increases, economic considerations will likely continue to play a significant role in shaping the field of architecture.

One prediction is that the use of renewable resources will become increasingly common as architects strive to create buildings that have a minimal impact on the environment and can reduce their energy consumption. This may involve the use of solar panels, green roofs, and other technologies that harness the power of the sun and other natural resources.

Another prediction is that there will be a greater emphasis on using modular and prefabricated construction methods, which can help reduce the cost of building and make it more financially viable for a wider range of clients. Additionally, as the cost of labour and materials continues to rise, architects will likely need to be more creative in finding ways to maximize the use of space and minimize the overall cost of construction.

Ultimately, the future of architecture will be shaped by a combination of economic, environmental, and societal factors, and architects will need to be able to navigate these challenges to create buildings that meet the needs of the future.

The role of technology in mediating the relationship between economy and design

Technology has the potential to play a significant role in mediating the relationship between economy and design in the field of architecture.

One way it can do this is by providing architects with new tools and techniques that make designing and building more sustainable, cost-effective buildings easier. For example, using 3D printing and other advanced manufacturing techniques can help reduce the cost of construction by minimizing the need for manual labour and allowing for the creation of complex, custom designs. Similarly, building information modelling (BIM) and other digital tools can help architects better visualize and plan their projects, reducing the risk of errors and costly changes during the construction process.

Technology can also help to make buildings more energy-efficient and cost-effective to operate over the long term. Smart building technologies, such as energy-efficient lighting and HVAC systems, can help to reduce energy consumption and lower the ongoing costs of running a building. Additionally, using smart sensors and other monitoring technologies can help architects gather data on their buildings' performance, allowing them to identify areas for improvement and make adjustments to optimize energy usage and save money.

The role of technology in mediating the relationship between economy and design in architecture is likely to continue to grow in the coming years as more advanced tools and technologies become available to architects.


In Conclusion

In the field of architecture, it is important to find a balance between economic considerations and design innovation. On the one hand, architects must consider the financial viability of their projects, including the initial cost of construction and the ongoing maintenance and energy costs that will be incurred over the lifetime of the building. At the same time, however, they must also strive to push the boundaries of design and create innovative and inspiring buildings. Striking this balance is not always easy, and architects must be creative and resourceful in finding ways to achieve both goals.

One way to balance economic considerations with design innovation is to focus on sustainability. By designing energy-efficient buildings and using renewable resources, architects can reduce the environmental impact of their projects and save their clients money over the long term. Using prefabricated and modular construction methods can help reduce the cost of building while still allowing for creative, unique designs.

Another approach is to consider the long-term economic impact of a building. While it may be tempting to cut corners to reduce the initial cost of construction, this can often lead to higher maintenance costs down the line. By investing in high-quality materials and building systems, architects can create more durable buildings requiring less maintenance, ultimately saving their clients money in the long run.

Ultimately, the key to finding the right balance between economic considerations and design innovation in architecture is to approach each project with a long-term perspective. By considering the long-term impact of their designs, architects can create both functional and financially viable buildings while also pushing the boundaries of design and creating inspiring, innovative spaces.


This article was originally published on Medium.com on 7 February 2023.